Will McCain seek to remove all abortion rights in every circumstance ? - sens 25 lcd hdtv flatscreen dvd tv
WARREN: (A) How is a baby with human rights?
SEN. McCain: At the time of conception. I have a 25-year-old pro-life Congress Documents of the Senate. And as President of the United States, a pro-life president and this presidency has established pro-life policies. That is my commitment is. That is my commitment to you.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Sens 25 Lcd Hdtv Flatscreen Dvd Tv Will McCain Seek To Remove All Abortion Rights In Every Circumstance ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Another reason not to vote for McCain. He likes to contradict claims to believe even the Bible,
Genesis 2:7 (NIV): "The Lord God took the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living being."
Note: The Breath of Life is not given, while later in the formation of man, but he made the man. After birth. As it was with Adam, so is humanity.
Exodus 21:22 (NIV), "If men who are fighting hit a woman becomes pregnant and abortion, but no serious injuries should the perpetrators be punished for what the woman asks the man, and the court."
If life begins at conception, troops have been stoned as a murderer. An unborn child has a value, but is considered a crime against property, not a homicide. Thou shalt not kill, do not apply the final chapter clearly before birth.
Other favorites of the crowd hypocritical fight against abortion: Psalm 51, David cries, after they are caught with Bathsheba, wordsCommit adultery, not God. Psalm 139 is to wax poetic David, not the word of God. Jeremiah Jeremiah 1 specific, and not for the whole of humanity. Read in context, and you will not be used for abortion. Job 3 is the lament of Job, his losses, he has read in context.
The Bible clearly says that life begins at birth. Only those who can gain political power (would be) at the risk of their souls bear false witness against the word of God and say: "The Bible says that life begins at conception."
I do not know, but I like the idea of abortion, but I think the child would be better if the mother knew that it would be a good mother, even rape victims who become pregnant should be entitled to abortion. Yes, there is acceptance, but if you can, what kind of home that the child is sought, and that once they are adopted or placed with foster parents to tell his whole life? Yes, I think, therefore, struck by an abortion, so if McCain go really said that, ultimately Stopit or should it all the time, so it has my vote
No, this is the position of abortion is used mainly to scare the opposition.
A true conservative believes that states should be responsible for determining the feasibility of the procedure.
This means that if Roe v. Wade.
The federal government should not make a decision about it.
It is the responsibility of States.
McCain is senile, brain move, suicide old wind in the loony bin instead of the White House. Why are some Americans will want the wind out of a mental disability, age, decide anything. This man is mentally ill and unfit to be president ..
It would not be the kind of power ... Please learn how laws are created in the United States ... They come from the top of Congress. All we can do is prez sign or veto. If he signs, then there is a right ... Then veto override them if the Congress would be the law.
Do not worry.
Regardless of what McCain, or any other president thinks about abortion, there is nothing that we do it in the short term to. Abortion is here to stay for at least another 20 years.
The question for Warren was incorrectly worded. There is a difference between human rights and the rights. In order to assign the legal rights to the "design" make our legal system upside down and it is not practical nor prudent.
He can say whatever he wants, but ultimately it is not the sole decision maker. He knows that to tell him what he wants and what he wants to get the votes of people who struggle to pro-life.
Bush and the Republicans have years, had something to do, and they do not want to pursue and get the votes of pro-life
Bush and the Republicans have years, had something to do, and they do not want to pursue and get the votes of pro-life
His decision not
Abortion is a moral stance.
No other leader to get rid of the puppets to the abortion, which keeps the population of consumers with low useless.
The abortion is done. No change is never
He will not touch Roe V Wade. Too much of a wedge issue and a political hot potato.
Well, I think the question is not about his "rank"
Post a Comment